Legal Opinion
Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. v. Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 3, 2014No. 11-2826PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. (“H & K”) appeals from an order of the District Court dismissing its complaint pursuant to the doctrine of judicial estoppel. For the reasons expressed below, we will affirm.
This case comes before us after traversing a complex procedural path, which the District Court aptly characterized as “lab-yrinthian.” Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc. (“Balfour”) contracted with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of Transportation (“PennDOT”) to be the general contractor for the construction of the Route 222 Bypass project (the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Montrose Medical Group Participating Savings Plan Montrose General Hospital, Inc. v. Richard A. Bulger Walter Garvey Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York Richard A. Bulger, Third-Party v. Eudora Bennett Montrose Medical Arts Pharmacy, Inc. Medical Arts Nursing Center, Inc. Medical Arts Clinic, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re O'brien Environmental Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. v. Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- THEIA TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. THEIA GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021