Legal Opinion

Evans v. Feeny

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 8824Published

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Franklin, C.

Appellants, in their petition for a rehearing, insist that the court erred in holding that the judgments of Evans and Brown were not liens upon the real estate in *539controversy, and that it could not be sold under executions upon said judgments.

William Feeny held the legal title to secure the payment, ■of the balance of the purchase-money, and was ready and willing to convey whenever that was paid. There had been no fraudulent conveyance from Peter Eeeny, and none had been made by William to any third party, nor did he hold the title in trust for Peter.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Modisett v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Doe ex dem. Davis v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  3. Newton v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  4. Jeffries v. SherburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Gentry v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API