Legal Opinion

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 20, 2022No. 3:21-cv-02114Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.: 21-cv-2114-JLS-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD- 14 JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A address 174.65.70.207, 15 RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE Defendant. 16 [DKT. NO. 4] 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve a Third-Party 19 Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. Dkt. No. 4. Plaintiff has sued only a fictitious 20 “Doe” defendant; thus, no party has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. Columbia Insurance v. Seescandy.ComDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  3. Richardson v. Western Oil, Coal & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API