Legal Opinion

C. Aultman & Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Rush District Court. Action by C. Aultman & Co. against Miller to recover on three promissory notes. At the January term, 1890, defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff company, a corporation, comes to this court. ' The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was an action to recover upon three promissory notes, amounting to $565.25, executed by Philip Miller in favor of C. Aultman & Co., on July 31, 1882, payable respectively in one, two and three years after date. The consideration for the notes was a threshing machine, which was warranted to be well made and to do good work, but whether the warranty was a written or verbal one, and what were all of its conditions, are disputed questions of fact. Miller tried to operate the machine for three weeks and failed, when he endeavored to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dutton v. DuttonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Kershaw v. SchaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API