Legal Opinion

Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to the master’s report. Intervention of H. G. Williams.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

That intervenor’s cattle suffered injuries and damages while in transit from Pecos to Willow Springs is not disputed. The intervenor claims that the causo was negligence and bad handling on the part of the railroad company. It is contended for the receiver that it was through the negligence of the intervenor and his employes, and on account of the poor condition of the stock at the time of shipment. An examination of the evidence shows that the cattle were wintered in Presidio county, Tex.; were wild; a part had been herded four or five weeks, and some never herded; that they were gathered up…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. TollersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Webster v. Union Pac. R.District Court, D. Colorado · 1912
  4. Dee v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Walrath v. American Railway Express Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API