Legal Opinion

Osteen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 23, 1993No. 92-451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

616 So.2d 1215 (1993)

Christopher S. OSTEEN and Charles M. Skeen, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 23, 1993.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from orders imposing restitution.

Appellants, Christopher Osteen and Charles Skeen, were charged by information with burglary of a structure and grand theft. They…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Cliburn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Arling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Garrison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schuette v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Montalvo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Elmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Stocks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Garay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API