State Of Washington v. Max Ortiz-triana
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶ 1 A jury found Max Ortiz-Triana guilty of rape in the second degree. Ortiz-Triana appealed, arguing the trial court erred in giving the State’s proposed jury instruction on consent and refusing to give the defense jury instruction clarifying the relationship between the defense of consent and the burden of the State to prove forcible compulsion. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, State v. Camara, 113 Wn.2d 631, 781 P.2d 483 (1989), and State v. Gregory, 158 Wn.2d 759, 147 P.3d 1201 (2006), we affirmed. State v. Ortiz-Triana, 169 Wn. App. 1026, 2012 WL 2989603, at *3-4, 2012 Wash. App. LEXIS…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Of Washington, V. Wendell Maurice ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Letheory Earlacosie DotsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State of Washington v. Rocky HensleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016