Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Kansas Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 8, 2013No. 108,204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, J.:

Before the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDR) can suspend a driver’s license as a result of a driver’s illegal breath alcohol concentration (BAC) level, Kansas law requires the arresting officer to serve the driver with a form notice called a DC-27 form. K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 8-1002(c). Our courts have treated the service of this form on the driver as jurisdictional, meaning if it is not properly served, then the KDR lacks the administrative authority or jurisdiction to suspend or restrict the driver’s driving privileges. Anderson v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 18 Kan. App. 2d 347,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  3. Byrd v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Enslow v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandate v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. Trowbridge v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Wall v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API