Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Boynton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

This is an action to determine conflicting claims to the north half of section 19, township 135, range 74 in Emmons county. The complaint is in the statutory form, and alleges plaintiff is “the owner in fee simple” of this land, that defendant claims an interest .in it, but has none. The defendant answers denying plaintiff’s interest in the land and in a counterclaim sets up “that he is the fee title owner of the real estate in the plaintiff’s complaint set forth and that he was such owner at all times mentioned in said complaint.” This allegation is denied by the plaintiff. The trial court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Rogers v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mudge v. SteinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Stubbs v. McGillisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larson v. DunnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Keda Development Corp. v. Stanglin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Woodbine Savings Bank v. YagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API