Legal Opinion

Natalini v. Little

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2006No. 26958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY W. LYNCH, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed a petition seeking damages against the Defendant for the wrongful death of their decedent due to Defendant’s alleged medical malpractice. Defendant raised, among other things, the affirmative defense that the Kansas statute of limitation, the application of which is required by the Missouri borrowing statute, barred Plaintiffs’ claim. The trial court sustained Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal this judgment, and we affirm.

1) Standard of Review

“Summary judgment is designed to permit the trial court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. O'GRADY v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Global Petromarine v. G.T. Sales & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Portia McMillan v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. c. DallyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API