Clifton Hills Realty Co. v. Cincinnati

MEMORANDUM ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Decided April 25, 1938

By MATTHEWS, J.

We have examined the application for rehearing and the grounds advanced in support of it. We find nothing advanced that was not considered at the original hearing, and have, therefore, concluded that a rehearing would not be helpful. As á result of our consideration of those grounds we make these additional observations:—(1) The repeal of a statute may violate the “Due Process Clause” of our constitutions 12 Am. Jur. 356.(2) In passing upon the sufficiency of tlir- amended petition, the motives of counsel were not…