Legal Opinion
People v. Spigner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 13, 2017No. 2015-06283PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered May 13, 2015, as amended June 23, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
The Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]) constituted a proper exercise of discretion, and did not deprive the defendant of the right to testify on his own behalf (see People v Manigat, 136 AD3d 614,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. TeboutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. FerdinandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018