Legal Opinion
In Re Haida Corporation, Debtor. Jim Edenso v. Haida Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1993No. 93-35104Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
2 F.3d 1156
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re HAIDA CORPORATION, Debtor.
Jim EDENSO, Appellant,
v.
HAIDA CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 93-35104.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 21, 1993.*
Decided Aug. 5, 1993.
Before: BROWNING, TANG, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Bankruptcy creditor Jim Edenso appeals the district court's decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wyandotte Savings Bank v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Commissioners of Highways v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981