Legal Opinion

Velarde v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 22, 1998No. 1:95-cv-01806PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

This matter is before me on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The parties agree that no material fact remains in dispute. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. Defendant is the United States of America, acting through the Farm Service Agency, formerly known as the Farmers Home Loan Administration (“FmHA”). Plaintiffs owned agricultural land in Las Animas County, Colorado (the “Ranch”), which, as a result of their borrowing, was encumbered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Impro Products, Inc. v. John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Utah v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Rode CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BergtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API