Hill v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtPhillip T. Whiteaker, Judge
LA Garland County jury convicted appellant Kendricks Hill of one count each of possession of a controlled substance, carrying a weapon, and public intoxication.- His sole argument on appeal is that the circuit court erred in denying his request for a continuance after his original lawyer became ill and a new attorney had to be appointed for him days before his case was scheduled to be tried. 1 We find no error and affirm.
Our standard of review from the denial of a continuance is well settled. A trial court shall grant a continuance only upon a showing of good cause and shall take into account…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Roston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Gonzales v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Mahomes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Haskins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chadwick Staggs v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Andruszczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Charles Shealy v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.