Swanson v. Schultz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The collision occurred because one of the drivers was on the wrong side of the road. Each claimed the other was the transgressor. The case was thoroughly tried, and in submitting it to the jury, questions were asked which searched for findings upon every possible material fact relating to the bumping of the two cars because of the operations of each leading up to the accident. The central or chief dispute is as to the position in the road taken by the respective drivers. As to this, as well as other questions of fact, a jury question exists. The claim of appellants that certain physical facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Roellig v. GearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Schliesleder v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Reykdal v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hebron Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. WhitelockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Hale v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Meissner v. PapasDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940