Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sullivan v. Mosser

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 2, 1948No. 9506Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKerner, Circuit Judge

In the District Court appellant did not raise the question or make any point of the fact that no notice had been given to the cestuis que trusten-t. His only contention was that the court lacked power to name the trustees. In this court he argues that the action of the court deprived the certificate holders of their rights, and that a bankruptcy court, while possessing equitable powers, is not a general court of equity. It is a creation of a Congressional statute which is the source of its power and limitation on that power. In other words, if the power to appoint trustees is not in the Act,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. American United Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API