Legal Opinion
West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2015No. Civil No. 13-1686 (JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge, United States District Court
Plaintiff retirement and investment funds (“plaintiffs”) bring this consolidated class' action against Medtronic and several of its officers and employees (“Medtronic Defendants” or “defendants”), alleging that the defendants made fraudulent state*978ments, and engaged in a fraudulent scheme, in violation of federal securities laws. The case centers on the bone product INFUSE and alleges that the defendants made false statements about the safety and efficacy of INFUSE, which led to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. Va. Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018