Legal Opinion

People v. Grant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant moved pursuant to CPL 170.30 to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that he had been denied his statutory right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.30). His motion was supported only by the affirmation of defense counsel, who never produced the minutes of the several adjournments of the case to rebut the arguments advanced by the Assistant District Attorney in her affirmation in opposition to the motion. Based upon the record before us (cf., People v Clendinen, 173 AD2d 366), we agree with the Supreme Court that *678any period of delay attributable to the People was well within six…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. ClendinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. LunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API