Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Car Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 19, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a patent suit. Plaintiff is the owner of three patents, and claims that defendant has infringed each and all of them. These patents are Elliott,. *377No. 1,499,510 (U. S.) applied for February 8, 1923, patent granted July 1, 1924, Ellis No. 1,500,118 (U. S.), applied for December 14, 1923, patent granted July 8, 1924, and Elliott, No. 1,501,325 (U. S.) applied for December 14, 1923, patent granted July 15, 1924.

These patents were all duly assigned by Elliott and Ellis to the plaintiff, and there is no dispute about the ownership.

Elliott thus applied for his first…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati Traction Bldg. Co. v. Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API