Legal Opinion

Nudell v. Forest Preserve Dist. of Cook County

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2003No. 94679 RelPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

At issue in this case is whether the 35-day period for filing a complaint under the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 101 et seq. (West 1998)) begins to run on the date that the agency decision is deposited in the United States mail or on the date that the decision is actually received by the party affected by the decision. The appellate court held that the 35-day period begins to run on the date that the agency decision is deposited in the United States mail. 333 Ill. App. 3d 518. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the appellate court.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Michael…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lockett v. Chicago Police BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nudell v. FOREST PRESERVE DIST. OF COOKIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. M.T.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Ryan v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  4. Ryan v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Blessing Hospital v. Illinois Health Facilities & Services Review BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API