Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middendorf v. Henry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 24, 1976No. 74-175Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Marshall,

with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.

We only recently held that, absent a waiver, “no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether classified as petty, misdemeanor, or felony, unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.” Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U. S. 25, 37 (1972). Today the Court refuses to apply Argersinger’s holding to defendants in summary court-martial proceedings. Assuming for purposes of its opinion that the Sixth Amendment applies to courts-martial in general, the Court holds that, because of their special characteristics, summary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API