Legal Opinion

Burks v. Donalty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has failed to establish entitlement to the relief sought by way of either prohibition or mandamus. With respect to prohibition, petitioner failed to show a clear legal right to the relief sought and that respondents are proceeding or are about to proceed “without or in excess of jurisdiction” (CPLR 7803 [2]; see, Matter of Haggerty v Himelein, 89 NY2d 431, 435; Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352-353; La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 578-579, cert denied 424 US 968), and petitioner has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Haggerty v. HimeleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Crain Communications, Inc. v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API