Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lynch v. County Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1978No. 75-807PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The appellants, Gary G. Cleveland and Ronald S. Sielo, and five others were charged with feloniously delivering cocaine, a controlled substance, contrary to secs. 161.41(1) (b), 161.16(4), and 939.05, Stats. Preliminary examination was commenced in the county court of Dane county. In the course of cross-examination of the state’s first witness, counsel for one of the defendants demanded any exculpatory material contained in reports prepared by the witness, and counsel for the other defendants joined in this motion. During the ensuing exchange, the motion became a general demand for all…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re ImblerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Madison Metropolitan School District v. Circuit CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Office of the State Public Defender v. Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Interest of T.M.J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. MATTER OF STATE EX REL. LYNCH v. County Ct.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API