Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Vessey

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 8, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-60065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant ... argues that the derivative claims of plaintiff John Hayes for loss of consortium are not cognizable in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Although there are no decisions directly on point, it is clear that the derivative claims of husband John Hayes are cognizable under § 1983. In Hall v. Wooten, 506 F.2d 564 (6th Cir.1974), the Court of Appeals was faced with the question of whether or not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myrtle Hall, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Edward Hall, Deceased v. Honorable George Wooten, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Whitson v. Whiteley Poultry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Pierce v. StinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linda Hayes and John Hayes, Cross-Appellants v. Harry Vessey, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Kinzer v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
  3. Brown v. Youth Services International of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  4. Zuyus v. Hilton RiversideDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API