Legal Opinion

Smith v. Train, Smith Counsel, L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered October 5, 1999, which denied defendant’s motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Looking “behind and beyond the label to ascertain the true nature of the transaction” (Purchasing Assocs. v Weitz, 13 NY2d 267, 273), the motion court properly determined that the restrictive covenant at issue was made in connection with a contract of employment and properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for a preliminary injunction since defendant failed to establish a likelihood of success on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Federation to Preserve the Greenwich Village Waterfront v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samuel-Rozenbaum USA, Inc. v. FelcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API