Legal Opinion

Federal Factors, Inc. v. Wellbanke

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 19, 1966No. 5-3942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellant, claiming to be a holder in due course, brought this action to enforce three instruments, entitled Trade Acceptances, executed by the appellee Wellbanke and by Richard J. Martin. Wellbanke contended that the instruments were not negotiable and that he was therefore entitled to interpose in his defense certain breaches of contract on the part of the drawer, Chemical Products, Inc. The trial court, sitting without a jury, sustained Wellbanke’s contentions. Negotiability is now the main issue.

In October 1962 Wellbanke and Martin signed a contract by which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White River Limestone Products Co. v. Mo.-Pac. Rd.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Trice v. People's Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BWH, Inc. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Salt Lake City v. Gump & Ayers Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Williams-Berryman Ins. v. MorphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API