In Re Draiman
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.
These matters come before the Court on confirmation of the fourth amended Chapter 11 plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) filed by Nachshon Draiman (the “Debtor”) and the objections thereto filed by Dynegy Marketing and Trade (“Dynegy”) and on the motion of Dynegy to dismiss or convert the case. 1 For the reasons set forth herein, the Court sustains in part Dynegy’s objections and denies confirmation of the Plan. In addition, the Court denies Dyne-gy’s motion to dismiss or convert the Debt- or’s case. Because the Court has denied confirmation…
2Cases cited125 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re: Ganess MaharajCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Dill Oil Company, LLC v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Trenton Ridge Investors, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- In re Aurora Memory Care, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- David Zachary v. California Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.