Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Robert J. And Emma R. Stuatr
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentStaley, Circuit Judge
One of the reasons for adopting the installment plan of reporting income was to relieve taxpayers from having to pay an income tax in the year of sale based on the full amount of anticipated profits when in the tax year they received in cash only a small part of the sales price. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co., 333 U.S. 496, 68 S.Ct. 695, 92 L.Ed. 831 (1948). Section 453 being remedial, “manifestly it is to be construed liberally in favor of the taxpayers to give the relief it was intended to provide.” Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 258, 263, 51…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wellmore Builders, Inc. v. WannierNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- B. B. Todd, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
- Frank H. Gilbert and Hazel P. Peterson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.