Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1987No. C6-86-999Published

1Opinion of the Court

400 N.W.2d 153 (1987)

Joseph Frank WHITE, Petitioner, Respondent,

v.

STATE of Minnesota, Appellant.

No. C6-86-999.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 3, 1987.

Review Denied March 25, 1987.

Kimball D. Mattson, Larry A. Kimball, Finn & Mattson, Walker, for respondent.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Earl E. Maus, Cass Co. Atty., Jodie A. Metcalf, Asst. Cass Co. Atty., Walker, for appellant.

Heard, considered, and decided by LESLIE, P.J., and FOLEY and RANDALL, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This appeal is from an order granting post-conviction relief to respondent Joseph White. After holding…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ChampionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. WittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Stahlberg v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API