Legal Opinion

Sandstrum v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 30, 1925No. 772PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

The facte of this ease, as pleaded, are substantially as follows:

The plaintiff is the owner of a large body of farming lands in Cowley county, this state, through which flows a stream called Grouse creek. Some twenty years ago there was constructed through parts of the land of plaintiff a railroad now owned and operated by defendant. As this line of railway runs *166through the land of plaintiff, it crosses a low swale or draw which leads from Grouse creek across the right of way to lands of the plaintiff on the opposite side of the railway from the creek. When the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. KeysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Darlington v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. SteckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Singleton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Thompson v. McDougalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Stafos v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. James StafosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API