Howard v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Justice.
After a trial by jury the defendant Ronald C. Howard, Jr., was found guilty of child molesting based largely upon the deposition testimony of a child witness who refused to testify at trial. Because there was no showing that the witness was unavailable for trial within the meaning of the protected person statute, the trial court erred in allowing the deposition into evidence. We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause for further proceedings.
Facts and Procedural History
Howard and Tina Brooks were married in October 1994. C.C., Brooks’ daughter…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hape v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kenneth Brittain v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. DurrettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.