Legal Opinion
Mike & Jim Kruse Partnership v. Cotton
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 26, 2021No. 20SA32PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
evidence extrinsic to the original proceedings is admissible only to resolve an ambiguity, not to create one. Therefore, the water court erred in relying on the 1936 photograph to find the decree ambiguous. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203
2021 CO 6
Supreme Court Case No. 20SA32 Appeal from the District Court Alamosa County District Court, Water Division 3, Case No. 17CW3003 Honorable Pattie P. Swift, Water Judge In the Matter of the Application for Water Rights of the Mike and Jim Kruse Partnership in Saguache County. Applicant-Appellee:…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Farmers High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peo v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2024