Legal Opinion

Mattice v. Babcock

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1932No. 5958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J. —

This proceeding in mandamus is brought by plaintiff seeking to compel defendant district judge to proceed with the trial of an action on its merits. From the petition it appears that plaintiff filed a complaint against Fred J. Walters and Chrissie M. Walters, his wife, as defendants, in the district court of Twin Falls county, to foreclose two real estate mortgages. Summons was issued by the clerk of that court. The sheriff of Twin Falls county made return thereon that he personally served the same on defendant Fred J. Walters at Twin Falls, by delivering to him personally a copy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hill v. MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. First Nat. Bank v. RuskOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Williams v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Title Guaranty Co. v. MardisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Chaney v. Village of MiddletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. WinsteadIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API