Hankins v. City of Alpharetta

Andrews, Judge.

The issue here is when the Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) charged a violation of “OCGA § 40-6-391” without specifying whether subsection (a) (1) or (a) (4) was meant and the evidence would have supported either subsection, was the superior court’s affirmance of the city court’s denial of a motion to quash for ambiguity reversible error? We find, on the record before us, that it was not.

No transcript of the proceedings below was produced and, therefore, we are limited to consideration of the record. The UTC charged that, on a specific date and time and in a specific location,…