Legal Opinion

Hurlock v. McLain

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1881No. 1135Published

Appeal from Navarro county. Opinion by Walker, P. J.

1Opinion of the Court

Suit brought to rescind a contract of sale of land, and for damages, alleging that the vendors had fraudulently represented that they had a valid title to the land, on which he relied. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs rescinding the contract and for damages; they afterward, remitted the damages. The assignments of error are general, not otherwise indicating the imputed errors than to refer in general to the court’s entire charge and to the several instructions refused. Held, these assignments are entirely too general for consideration. 54 Tex., 641; id., 285; 16 Tex., 233; 15 Tex., 435. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShaferTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Fisk v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Giddens v. Byers' HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Hicks v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1856

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API