Goldstein v. Rau

Appellants are two of five defendants who were sued for malicious prosecution by the appellee, one of the other defendants having been returned non est, and the verdict having been in favor of the other two under instructions of the trial court.

The narr. alleges that the. defendants and each of them did, on or .about February 21th, 1921, charge upon oath before Magistrate Chapman, one of the police justices of Baltimore City, that the plaintiff owned and maintained a dog in violation of Ordinance No1. 138, by allowing said dog to disturb a certain neighborhood; that as a result of such charge…