Legal Opinion

Russell v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 6, 1965No. 23175, 23177; 23176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

There is and can be no denial that the joint will bequeathed and devised to the survivor to have and to hold in fee simple all the property of the testator. The dispute arises because of other provisions of the will. Appellees contend that such provisions create a precatory trust and they strongly rely upon Ingram v. Fraley, 29 Ga. 553, for support of this position, while appellants assert that all such language is a mere expression of mutual confidence and appropriate directions to the executor in winding up the estate. In this position they are supported by Code §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Hungerford v. Trust Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Smith v. SladeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Ingram v. FraleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beecher v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API