Legal Opinion
Dang v. Walgreens Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 10, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00177Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAM DANG and YASMINE ACOSTA- AGUAYO, on behalf of themselves and all other plaintiffs similarly situated, Case No. 22-cv-00177 Judge Mary M. Rowland Plaintiffs, v. WALGREENS CO. d/b/a WALGREENS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Walgreens Co. (“Walgreens”) moves to compel arbitration and stay proceedings in this putative class action brought by Tam Dang1 and Yasmine Acosta-Aguayo (“Plaintiff”) under the Class Action Fairness Act § 28 U.S.C. 1332(d), asserting various state law claims. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Cabinetree of Wisconsin, Incorporated v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- St. Mary's Medical Center of Evansville, Incorporated v. Disco Aluminum Products Company, Incorporated, N/k/a Luminar Products, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Christopher L. Gore v. Alltel CommuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.