Sumeral v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Sumeral was indicted for the grand larceny of some rolls of wire fencing, the property of Braxton Dempsey. A jury in the Franklin Circuit Court found him guilty and he appeals.
Viewed from the verdict, the State’s case tended to show (unless otherwise indicated) :
Tuesday evening, June 18, 1957, about five o’clock, Braxton Dempsey had gotten off work and when he reached home he found a crib — part of his barn — had been broken into and six rolls of barb wire fencing and twelve of hog wire were gone. Swaths through the weeds showed how the rolls were transported to the nearby public…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Earl E. Vick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Ex parte AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Yoffe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Bass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Creel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.