Daggett v. Champlain Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury, Rut-land County, September Term, 1899, Taft, O. J., presiding. Yerdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff claimed that the defendant by its agent, J. R. McLaren, purchased of him a quantity of lumber, June 1, 1891. This action is brought to recover the price of a part of the lumber alleged by the plaintiff to have been delivered *333to the defendant under the contract, and for damages for its refusal to accept the balance of the lumber claimed to have been purchased. The defendant denied having made the alleged purchase and claimed that the plaintiff sold the lumber to one Barnard who manufactured a part of it into chair stock, and that a part of such chair stock was sold to it, with…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Curtin v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907