Legal Opinion
Gildenhorn v. Lum's Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1971No. 70 Civ. 5733, 71 Civ. 1925 and 4218PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
Defendants in these consolidated actions have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaints upon the ground that they fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6) F.R. Civ.P. Alternatively, all defendants move this court to stay these actions pending a final determination in Sanders v. Lum’s Inc. et al., 70 Civ. 5331, a related action pending before this court. Additionally, the individual defendants move that the complaints be dismissed as against them upon the ground that jurisdiction over their persons has not been obtained. Rules 4(e) and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harold Marsh v. William A. Kitchen and Ray T. Zakovich, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc. v. BirenbaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Schein v. ChasenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Schein v. ChasenSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.