Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Bulte

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. Proceedings to recover possession of lands. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Bulte commenced a summary proceeding before a circuit court commissioner under Comp. Laws, ch. 211, to recover possession of certain premises in Detroit. He based his complaint on section 6706, and at the trial rested his right to recover upon an alleged purchase made at a foreclosure sale under the statute regulating foreclosure by advertisement. Comp. Laws, ch. 218. After proving that Hebert was in possession and that the premises had been demanded of him, he gave in evidence a deed to himself from the sheriff, the sheriff’s indorsement that the deed would become operative December 15,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doyle v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Barman v. CarharttMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lariverre v. RainsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Snyder v. HemmingwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Britan v. Straus Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API