Legal Opinion

Castle v. Town of Guilford

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 12, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case for negligence. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1912, Windham County, Butler, J., presiding. Yerdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

The action is ease and is brought under P. S. 4029, for damages to the property of the plaintiff claimed to have been suffered by reason of the insufficiency and want of repair of a bridge and its approaches in the defendant town. Trial by jury was had, a verdict for the plaintiff was returned and judgment was rendered thereon. The defendant excepted.

A written notice was given to the selectmen of the town within the time required by statute and was received in evidence. The notice omitting the address and signature, about which no question is made, reads as follows:

“You are hereby notified…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kent v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  2. Bacon v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  3. Fassett v. Town of RoxburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  4. Herrick v. Town of HollandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Drew v. Town of SuttonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Village of Enosburg FallsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Bigelow v. Town of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  3. Widham v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Parker v. Town of PittsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  5. Cushman v. Town of BristolzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API