Legal Opinion

Slater v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1992No. CR 92-111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Hugh Allen Slater, Jr., appellant, was convicted of two counts of rape and two counts of kidnapping involving two different victims. He argues that the trial court misconstrued the rape shield statute and erroneously refused to allow him to present evidence of both prosecutrixes’ sexual consent on other occasions. The trial court correctly applied the statute, and we affirm the judgments of conviction.

At trial appellant asserted a consent defense, and filed a motion pursuant to the rape shield statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-42-101 (1987), asking that he be allowed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flurry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Flurry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Manees v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Drymon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. State v. BabbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Samples v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API