Legal Opinion

Louis Curt Pannagl v. David Lambert

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 4, 2014No. 2013-CA-01169-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, C.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from the chancellor’s denial of a motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Finding that the chancellor abused her discretion, we reverse and remand.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. On August 19, 2011, David Lambert (Lambert) filed a petition in the Chancery Court of Pike County to probate a copy of Louis S. Pannagl Jr.’s (Louis) last will and testament. Louis was Lambert’s stepfather. The sworn petition alleges that the original of the will was lost and that it was not destroyed by Louis with the intent to revoke it. Louis’s original will could not be found.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tricon Metals & Services, Inc. v. ToppMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ladner v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Foster v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Collins v. Koppers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Covington v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howard Industries, Inc. v. Selina HayesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022
  2. Leland School District v. Michell C. BrownCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API