Legal Opinion

Giles v. Churchill

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 15, 1831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was an action of trover for four steers, in which the plaintiff sued as administrator of the estate of Joseph Giles, deceased. - . - . , The cause was tried upon the general issue, at January term, 1830, and a verdict taken by consent for the defendant, subject to the opinion of the court upon the following case. The intestate died in September, 1828, leaving some properly, and owing several debts.

Read the full summary

This was an action of trover for four steers, in which the plaintiff sued as administrator of the estate of Joseph Giles, deceased. - . - . , The cause was tried upon the general issue, at January term, 1830, and a verdict taken by consent for the defendant, subject to the opinion of the court upon the following case. The intestate died in September, 1828, leaving some properly, and owing several debts. John B. Giles, his brother, at the request of the present plaintiff, another brother of the deceased, and with the assent of the other heirs, undertook to administer the estate without letters…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

We are inclined to think that an executor, de son tort, cannot by a sale of the goods of the deceased give any title to the purchaser against a rightful *342executor or administrator. 2 Starkie’s Ev. 551 ; 5 Coke, 31 ; Lovelass, 50 ; Yelverton, 138, note, 3 ; 4 Burn’s Ec. Law, 190; 1 Yentris, 349; 5 B. & A. 744, Woolley v. Clark; Wentworth, 181 ; Com. Dig. Administrator, C 3.

But in this case John B. Giles undertook to settle the estate of the deceased by the request of this very plaintiff. Whatever John B. Giles did, then, may be considered as done at the request, and with the assent…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clarke v. ClaySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API