Legal Opinion

State v. Hewitt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 2009No. 4D08-4008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCiklin, J.

The State appeals a sentencing order, arguing that the trial court erred in not sentencing the defendant as a habitual felony offender without holding a hearing or making the required findings pursuant to section 775.084(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). We dismiss, finding sua sponte that a legal sentence is not an appealable order.

Under section 775.084(3)(a), before determining habitual felony offender status, a trial court is required to do the following:(3)(a) In a separate proceeding, the court shall determine if the defendant is a habitual felony offender or a habitual violent felony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Polk County v. SofkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Ruffin v. KINGSWOOD E. CONDOMINIUM ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. State v. FigueroaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. State v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. State v. McMahonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. State v. PickleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. State v. PickleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API