Steinbrecher v. Wapnick
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Breitel, J. (dissenting).
This appeal raises an issue of first impression. There is no disagreement among the court that a plaintiff may waive the privilege against self incrimination by bringing an action concerning the privileged matter (Levine v. Bornstein, 7 AD 2d 995, affd. 6 N Y 2d 892; 3 Weinstein-KornMiller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., § 3126.15). Nor is there any disagreement that, in merely defending an action, the privilege of a defendant need not be waived, and, indeed, is not waived by such defense alone. Thus, it has been held that a defendant need not verify his pleading if self…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.