Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steinbrecher v. Wapnick

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1969Published

1Dissent

Breitel, J. (dissenting).

This appeal raises an issue of first impression. There is no disagreement among the court that a plaintiff may waive the privilege against self incrimination by bringing an action concerning the privileged matter (Levine v. Bornstein, 7 AD 2d 995, affd. 6 N Y 2d 892; 3 Weinstein-KornMiller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., § 3126.15). Nor is there any disagreement that, in merely defending an action, the privilege of a defendant need not be waived, and, indeed, is not waived by such defense alone. Thus, it has been held that a defendant need not verify his pleading if self…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. People v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API