Sandnes' Sons, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Concurrence
Cowen, Chief Judge',
concurring: in; part and:-dissenting in‘parts:¡,;. T.agrep with the majority that,the redetermination pr04 ceeding and the collection proceeding are, as before, separate and independent, leggl actions which, may now be pursued in one court; that this court is,an appropriate forum;for,,rendition, Of .judgment in .favor of*the defendant on its counter*118claim for the amount of excess profits determined by the Eenegotiation Board; and that the defendant’s request for assistance in “execution” of the order of the Renegotiation Board, when the plaintiff files a petition here for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.